The lack of halo effect

If the monks who taught me had a fault, it was an attachment to the European Union that was not so much excessive as beyond all reason. At some point an especially europhile headmaster had the "European" flag (the twelve stars from Revelation 12:1, but that is no excuse) flown from the Abbey Tower on great occasions.  It was only following loud protests from boys in the school that the Union Flag was flown instead.

Countries that use the euro (the currency, not the species of small kangaroo)  are allowed to use their own designs on one face of the coins they issue. Slovakia decided to commemorate the 1,150th anniversary of the arrival of Christianity by minting coins displaying Saints Cyril and Methodius, two monks (brothers in fact) who preached the Gospel to the Slavs. The European Commission, the enforcement arm of the EU, ordered Slovakia to remove the halos from the two saints' heads and the crosses from Methodius' pallium. This was prompted by complaints from France and Greece,

apparently because it considers the Greek-born monks Cyril and Methodius as part of its own heritage.

Official France's pompous secularism surprises nobody but yikes the Greeks are the most cranky dogs in the manger. (They also whine about another country's choice of name.) I wonder what they would say if Russia put Cyril and Methodius on their coins?

Anyway it seems Slovakia stood its ground and the coins have now been issued

The trinkets of Rome

At some point in the early 1890s the Archbishop of Canterbury, Edward White Benson*, carried out the third visitation of his diocese.  His addresses to the clergy on that occasion were collected in a book Fishers of Men  (London: Macmillan, 1893), which is available at the Internet Archive.  I could not find it directly through Google Books and I was only getting the top half of each page when I tried to use the online reader (which is useful for linking you directly to a given page). YMMV.

I have not read this book, I was only flicking through it to see the context for a quotation. In Chapter 5, Archbishop Benson discusses "Spiritual Power".

The Power we speak of is of course power in relation to human life. Power to mould and to invigorate the life of man.  So the person or the institution in which spiritual power is, has gained and keeps the Divine view of life, and deals with life in the Divine method.  It is from Jesus Christ alone that the Divine view and the Divine method can be learnt (p.111).

He contrasts this with a purely mechanical method of power. From this Archbishop Benson gradually unfolds an elegant expression of the standard Protestant "corruption theory" of the medieval Church.

You may trace the rise of the mechanical system of compulsory confession in and about Orleans in the ninth century, part of the tremendous effort to raise the barbarian lords and subjects; the gradual formalising, the destruction of spontaneity, the tariff of penances, the numerous repetition of devotional formulas, the gradual assumption of more and more authority in the form of absolution, the growth of a new sacrament, the fabulous basis and mockery of Indulgence. (pp.115-116).

He even quotes St Teresa of Avila against the Church, who "again and again speaks of her directors as lowering and impairing her spiritual strength."  The doctrine of the Real Presence is seen as a way to ease the difficulty of ascending in heart and mind to God by translating God "at any moment" "into the material world" and localising Him here. "The curious application of a transient figment of philosophy [i.e. transubstantiation CCC 1374-1376] to the mystery of Communion rationalised this and pronounced it done. The very earthly flesh of Christ was brought back to be worshipped." (pp.116-117). The same materialism leads "Rome" to the doctrine of the Immaculate Conception and devotion to the Sacred and Immaculate Hearts. (He calls it the worship of "two Sacred Hearts", but that is just an oversight.) This devotion, he claims is the restoration of the Manichaean heresy (p.117).

The reason Archbishop Benson brings all this up is he detects some of it in the Church of England, particularly in ritualism ("solicitude for deayed usages"). In his view the end of Catholic devotions is devotionalism: "the Kingdom will be a mustard-tree no more; it will be a petty herb of mint or anise: no more nested in by all the Birds of heaven—great, swift strong winged minds, as well as the shy and tender." (p.121). He digresses briefly on the power of Anglican laymen (what Newman called the State's pattern man, in a passage denounced by Kingsley) to remedy devotional "weakness" in the Anglican clergy, and then returns to his theme. 

What a moment is this to be fingering the trinkets of Rome! The very moment when it is denying not the "power" (that would be hopeless) but the "authority" of  the church of this country with an audacity never used before. The "power" shines in dark places, and strikes to the edge of the world. So it is the "authority" which must be disparaged now. [Earlier he had distinguished between power and authority, both of which the Church possessed; the latter without the former belonging to the Prophets, the former without the latter belonging to the Pharisees]. Large-minded men may be amused, but surely not without indignation, at being assured that 1200 Roman Catholic Bishops have refused to admit the validity of English orders; as if that contained some argument—as if we did not not know what the position of thesegood men is; at being assured that a pallium  not being received here from Romeis a proof that the continuity of the British and English Church is broken; at being assuredthat England has been just dedicated as "Mary's Dowry" and placed "to-day" under the Patronage of St. Peter. Is it a time to be introducing among our simple ones the devotional life of that body? (pp.122-123).

[Reference to a power which "shines in dark places, and strikes to the edge of the world" probably means the British Empire. Of course a baby born in the course of this visitation would have been old enough to be ordained into the Church of England in 1914 just as the British Empire entered the first of two wars which would destroy it and lead to Britain's utter humiliation. Even though they won.]

So why mention this? Well the Daily Telegraph in London just published an interview with +Justin, the 105th Archbishop of Canterbury.

“I am a spiritual magpie,” he says. As well as speaking in tongues (a Protestant practice), he adores the sacrament of the eucharist (a Catholic one).

And again: 

For his own spiritual discipline, Justin Welby uses Catholic models – the contemplation and stability of Benedictines, and the rigorous self-examination of St Ignatius. And, in a choice that could not possibly have been made since the 16th century – until now – the Archbishop’s spiritual director is Fr Nicolas Buttet, a Roman Catholic priest.

A Catholic Priest as the spiritual director of an Anglican! And not answering questions so as to clear the way for a conversion, mind. Newman would do his nut.  To be fair, Justin Cantuar:'s evocation of Catholic models could be justified in Benson's terms, for the latter seems to have some sympathy with the spirituality of St Teresa of Avila.(Although Benson could simply have been quoting a Catholic to twit the Catholics, just like I, erm, am doing here, quoting one AofC against another).

Fingering the trinkets of Rome indeed.

* (Archbishop Benson's youngest son, Robert Hugh Benson, became a Catholic in 1903 and subsequently a priest. He was the author of Lord of the World and The Friendship of Christ.)

It was the best of times, it was the worst of times

In response to the imbecile thuggery of the modern progressives there are an awful lot of denunciatory articles, books, podcasts, blogposts ect ect ect.  I have read hardly any as good as Welcome to the Mental Ward by Anthony Esolen. 

A comic nightmare comes to mind.  I see a man jiggered and wired to a hundred machines, each jolting him at irregular intervals.  His cheek twitches, his head jerks, his fingers drum, his knee wobbles, his feet tap, his breath is interrupted with coughs, his blood runs hot and cold.  I invite him to leave that contraption, and take a walk with me over to a chapel nearby, and say a quiet prayer. “You can’t make me!” he cries.  “I’m free to choose!”

From what you know to what you don't know

There are plenty of Catholic parishes totally allergic to the use of Latin.  You get the impression they would come out in hives if you just said "in nomine Patris…" Nevertheless, even in such parishes, the original language of the "Lord have mercy", the Greek "Kyrie eleison", is often used. 

 Kyrie eleison consists of a vocative, Kyrie, followed by an aorist imperative eleison. The vocative is the case for addressing someone.  "The Lord sits on high" – "the Lord" is in the nominative; but "Lord have mercy" – "Lord" is in the vocative since he is being addressed or called on (Latin voco I call).  In the indicative mood (the mood used for the verb in basic statements or questions – and for present purposes I am restricting this account to theGreek of the New Testament) the default tense is the present.  Outside of the indicative, for example in the imperative (where we give orders) the default tense is the aorist.  In the indicative the aorist is typically about past time, it is the equivalent of the English simple past (he went there). In Greek, the aorist indicative modifies the beginning of the verb with an augment (usually a short e) which shows that the verb is about the past. In the imperative the aorist has no reference to the time when something takes place or the length of time it takes to occur. For this reason the aorist imperative does not have an augment

We write "Kyrie eleison" in English texts because that is how it is spelt in Latin texts.  In Greek it is Κύριε ἐλέησον which might (I stress might) be more accurately transliterated "Kurïe eleēson".  The exigencies of Roman pronunciation of Greek led to the spelling we use.  The aorist imperative is a bit abrupt. It is the way one addresses a servant.  The possible rudeness of this construction when addressing the Almighty might be explained by remembering that each time we are asking for mercy, we do so because we actually need it right now – not that we are fine for the moment but keep the mercy coming just in case.

ἐλέησον looks like it has an augment (ἐ/e) which is confusing since the ending is an imperative. But don't (as I said above) aorist imperatives lack the augment? They do and in this case the ἐ is not an augment but part of the stem of the verb ἐλέεω "I have mercy on, show pity to". The aorist indicative "I had pity" is ἠλέησα ēleēsa. In this verb past time is indicated by "stretching" the initial "e" so that it becomes long.

When I was teaching Greek I pointed my students to the Eleemosynary Office(s) (search Eleemosynarius and see here) of the Holy See which carry out the Pope's charitable activities to help them remember that ἐλέησον comes from a verb that begins with an epsilon (ε).

Of course that depends on being familiar with that institution. (It is the source of Papal blessings which people give newly weds or couples on their major anniversaries and so on). To Dr Rod Decker (due respect, due respect) of the Baptist Bible Seminary it is an entirely new word. The article he links to is very interesting.

 

Easier access to the Catechism

The trouble with the Vatican website's publication of the English version of Catechism of the Catholic Church is that the index lacks the numbers used everywhere by everyne to refer to a specific passage.  Nobody uses the chapter numbers. You have to click on one of the links to to chapter, article, or section names in the approximate area and work your way from there. There is a similar problem with the French, Latin and Latvian editions. The ChineseMalagasy, Portugese and Spanish editions all have the range of paragraph numbers next to each link for easier navigation. The Italian edition is similarly divided but in much longer ranges (the first is nn.1-1065) and the links take you to large PDFs.

 St Charles Borromeo Catholic Church in Picayune, Miss. has acquired the right to publish the complete Catechism on its own website. They offer the standard table of contents (as on the Vatican website) as well as a table of contents with paragraph numbers. Both take you to the same files.

While we are on the subject here are direct links to the various indexes to the Catechism on the Vatican website (I can never find them in a hurry):

Alphabetical index
 Words arranged by frequency
 Reverse alphabetical index (i.e. by the last letter in a word)
 Words arranged by length
 Frequency statistics

I am not sure what use there is for any of these apart from the first but there they are, so there you go. 

 

Not the whole book of Genesis

I am not sure why but NASA's Image of the Day for 26th June 2013 is the famous and beautiful Earthrise photograph taken by the astronauts of Apollo 8, taken on Christmas Eve 1968.

That evening, the astronauts--Commander Frank Borman, Command Module Pilot Jim Lovell, and Lunar Module Pilot William Anders--held a live broadcast from lunar orbit, in which they showed pictures of the Earth and moon as seen from their spacecraft. Said Lovell, "The vast loneliness is awe-inspiring and it makes you realize just what you have back there on Earth." They ended the broadcast with the crew taking turns reading from the book of Genesis.

Good thing NASA"s copy writer remembered to include the "from".  That could have been rather a long reading.

The white gloves of destruction

Some time in the mid-twelfth century, scribes in England put together a collection of sermons by St Augustine of Hippo, and other Fathers, in a small handheld codex.  About 250 years later it was definitely in the collection of the Bibliotheca Amploniana in the University of Erfurt, in the geographical centre (more or less) of modern Germany.

In 2007 researchers from the Austrian Academy of Sciences were examining the codex and discovered that among the thirty sermons by Augustine were the texts of four entirely unknown sermons and the complete text of two more which otherwise only survive in fragments. The texts were published in 2008 in Wiener Studien 121 and Wiener Studien 122, the house journal (I believe) of the Austrian Academy of Sciences.

The researchers' webpage on the find has links to a video (wmv, will not play natively on the Mac, the free VLC player should be able to handle it) with an interesting presentation of the the story (I cribbed the above two paragraphs from it) of the manuscript and the significance of Augustine etc.  I was struck by the photographs which show the manuscript itself, sometimes in the hands of a librarian (I guess) at the Amploniana.  He is wearing white gloves, the uniform of the librarian/archivist trade.

I was struck because I discovered some time ago that there is quite a strong reasoned case against the blanket use (har-dee-dee-har-har) of white gloves when handling archive materials. No less an institution than the National Archives of the United Kingdom will not require people handling its materials (photographs excepted) to wear gloves [pdf].

(Via Br Robert OP). 

Still not setting

"The Sun," said Mr. Bull,  "never sets on English dominion. Do you understand how that is?" "Oh yes," said the Indian, "that is because God is afraid to trust them in the dark."

That story is attributed to Abraham Lincoln in The Yale Book of Quotations. (The source  makes it plain that John Bull's interlocutor is a Native American). A distinctly less politically correct version was used in a speech at the second annual meeting of the Associated Alumni of the Pacific Coast (no I have no idea either).

According to xkcd (this bloke) the sun still hasn't set on the British Empire.

 

Gus and Tommy Latine

Augustinus.it provides the complete works of St Augustine in Latin and Italian. They are organised according the Augustine volumes in Patrologia Latina (PL 32-46). For some reason PL 46 is not included in the "elenchus" on the left but the sermons in that volume can be found by searching "PL 46" in the Tavola Cronologica. Unfortunately it does not include the prefatory material found in the printed volumes. This means it is no help in deciphering the PDF of this discussion of the text of sermones inediti.

There is also a page of links to English translations of his works. Apart from those listed there, I don't know of any others.

Corpus Thomisticum is a site with the complete works of St Thomas Aquinas, courtesy of the University of Navarre. There is also a collection of links to volumes of the Leonine edition on archive.org.

New Advent only has a translation of the Summa Theologica, done by the Fathers of the English Dominican Province in 1920. The Dominican House of Studies in Washington, D.C. offers the complete works of Aquinas in more recent translations. (Bookmark that link because there is no obvious way to navigate there from the homepage). It was novices at the DHS who produced that charming work Lives of the Dominican Saints. I wouldn't mention that, except that it always makes Dominicans squirm when I do.

He'll do

The BBC has a bit of a problem with bias. Do you remember the Guardian's Operation Clark County?

In the run up to the US presidential election, the left-wing paper identified the area as a vote-swingers hotspot. Under Operation Clark County, it began a letter-writing campaign which aimed to give people outside the US a say in the election. The project set up its readers as pen pals with American voters, to press home the international ramifications of a vote for Republican George Bush or Democrat John Kerry.

It did not quite have the intended result.

In 2000, Al Gore won Clark County by 324 votes. And since Ralph Nader received 1,347 votes, we can assume Gore's margin would have been larger without Nader on the ballot. On Tuesday George Bush won Clark County by 1,620 votes. The most significant stat here is how Clark County compares to the other 15 Ohio counties won by Gore in 2000. Kerry won every Gore county in Ohio except Clark. He even increased Gore's winning margin in 12 of the 16. Nowhere among the Gore counties did more votes move from the blue [Democrat] to the red [Republican] column than in Clark. 

Anyway the genius responsible for Operation Clark County is now an editor on the BBC's Newsnight.

Believing Commie Nazi lies about Pius XII

I have already posted on the framing of Pius XII by the Communists, specifically the KGB:

Stalin took Pius XII’s encyclical [Orientales omnes ecclesias, on the Ukrainian Catholic Church] as a declaration of war, and he answered as was his wont: framing Pius XII as a Nazi collaborator. On June 3, 1945, Radio Moscow proclaimed that the leader of the Catholic Church, Pope Pius XII, had been "Hitler’s Pope," mendaciously insinuating that he had been an ally of the Nazis during World War II. Radio Moscow’s insinuation fell flat as a pancake … The Kremlin’s attempt to frame Pius XII as Hitler’s Pope was rejected by that contemporary generation that had lived through the real history and knew who Pope Pius XII really was. The Kremlin tried again in the 1960s, with the next generation, which had not lived through that history and did not know better. This time it worked. 

It turns out it is a Nazi lie which is at the bottom of a claim that Pius XII was on their side.

The current charge claims that in a presentation Pius XII gave at an International Eucharistic Congress in Hungary in 1938—when he was still Eugenio Pacelli, Vatican Secretary of State—he referred to Jews as enemies of Christ and the Catholic Church.

Earlier attempts at smearing the Pope have been refuted, at least in the academy, but this looks like a smoking gun.

With the assistance of Vatican historian … Fr. Peter Gumpel, we reviewed the text of the speech as it was published in Discorsi e Panegirici. The quote as given by the critics does not appear therein. The ellipsis was used to link very diverse passages from different pages of Pacelli’s speech, producing a complete distortion of Pacelli’s words. … He referred to the masses that called for the Crucifixion and said they had been “deceived and excited by propaganda, lies, insults and imprecations at the foot of the Cross.” Those identified as enemies of Christ included Pontius Pilate, Herod, the Roman soldiers, the Sanhedrin, and their followers. He did not call out “all Jews” or “the Jews." About two pages later in the manuscript, Pacelli referred to those who were persecuting the Church at that time by doing things like expelling religion and perverting Christianity. Jews were not doing this, but Nazi Germany certainly was. The future pope was clearly equating the Nazis, not Jews, to those who persecuted the Church at earlier times.

It is not the KGB who are responsible for this one but some Nazi sympathisers in Hungary.

Where did the distorted quotation come from? The first use in English was by Herczl, in his Christianity and the Holocaust of Hungarian Jewry (1993).  … Herczl was not present at the speech and did not even look at Pacelli’s script which can be found in Discorsi e Panegirici, a collection of Pius’s early writings first published in 1939, or even the Italian version that appeared in the Vatican newspaper. In his book, he cited a Hungarian newspaper, Nemzeti Ujsag (National Journal), with a long and controversial history as a political outlet.

 … 

The evidence is against Herczl. As its name implies and as numerous articles in the newspaper itself attest, Nemzeti Ujsag was a political journal, not a religious one. It was, at least in the relevant years, overtly anti-Semitic and truly despicable. Randolph L. Braham, a noted scholar in the field, called it a voice of National Socialism. … 

It is likely that the newspaper manufactured the quotation to support its anti-Semitic position. Pacelli, after all, was criticizing the exact political position the paper held. Then as now, Vatican support was a very useful thing to claim.

People would rather believe Communists or Nazis than the truth.

Reading links

Jo Walton at Tor.com started with a post on Is There a Right Age to Read a Book? In a follow up, What's Reading For?, she noted that in the comments

…people started talking about prescribing childhood reading and talking about books as if they were vitamins that you should take because they’re good for you. There were comments about the immorality of re-reading because it causes you to miss new books, and comments about learning morality from reading. It all became surprisingly Victorian.

Leaving the good folk south of the Murray River aside for a minute, she followed with What's Reading For Part 2 : Books Do Furnish a Mind which also discusses re-reading.

Meanwhile Joe Queenan at the Wall Street Journal discusses My 6,128 Favorite Books – that's his, not mine.

Welcome, welcome

This is why I have not been posting much for the last few months.  I had to update links and try to tweak the layout. I still haven't worked out how to make the tag index on your right alphabetical. Anyway all new tee pee gee eff posts will be here.